it has been published after some other deviations, all in traditional art gallery.
just take a look at her whole gallery and you'll see that some details in her paintings are pixellized, and some other are modified from a deviation to another in a strange way that would need layers, so, I don't believe all her gallery is just "traditional art". I don't think the author is not honest, I just think she doesn't speak english.
yes I'm pretty sure most of the paintings are digital... the first 3 paintings that are clearly traditional differ way too much in technique than the rest of the gallery....and the dodge glowy effect on fav.me/d6rns45 is virtually impossible to do in traditional. also the "altar' paintings are virtually copies of each other where only the open and closed door is different...that piece is clearly layer work since there's a sharpness from the chalices that differ from the diffused background also almost impossible to do in traditional.
I think the pieces ended up in that category since she started out with uploading traditional paintings and probably never changed the default settings afterwards for later work.
It is probably one of those users who put everything of their work under one category regardless if its photomanip, digital or trad. And yes this looks rather like photomanip with digital drawing and MAYBE a bit of trad. But who really knows...